Questions for Jim McGovern

About CICP, the recent EUA for 6-month olds and H. 4813

On June 18, 2022 my wife, Maryellen, and I traveled down to the Holden Senior Center where Congressman Jim McGovern met for coffee and reply to questions from his constituents in the 2nd district of MA.

Rep. Jim McGovern @RepMcGovern

Holden, Rutland, Princeton, Sterling, Paxton, and West Boylston: thanks for coffee and your great questions. Gathering together is a pleasure and I'll be taking your concerns with me to better advocate for our community in Congress.

We asked him three questions related to:

1. the 5,449 pending death and injury claims to the HHS run Counter Measures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) following COVID-19 vaccinations;

2. investigating the recently emergency use authorization (EUA) granted to Pfizer and Moderna booster vaccinations for 6-month old infants and older; and

3. Democrat Senator Rebbeca Rausch’s and Representative Andy Vargas’ bill H. 4813 which will remove a parents ability to file a religious accommodation for any required vaccination to attend a MA school.

In reporting on our visit I will first provide a background on our initial visit with Jim nearly ten years ago and our subsequent experience in the vaccine injury court in the prologue this will then be followed with a section dedicated to each of the following three aforementioned questions and a conclusion on the current state of affairs with the biologics division at the FDA and the CDC. We have all been impacted by these agencies decisions as they relate to COVID-19 vaccines. We were skeptical from the start and steered clear from their potentially harmful effects; however, our youngest daughter was injured nearly ten years ago from her four month old vaccinations. Thus, we are deeply concerned about those American’s who have been harmed and will most likely not receive any compensation from the federal government for injury and/or death.

Prologue

We have met with Jim in the past about our youngest daughter Cecilia’s catastrophic injury she incurred following her four month vaccinations received on 10/02/2012. The vaccines she received were the Pentacel vaccine, a five in one multivalent vaccine consisting of DTaP, HIB, and IPV, and the Prevnar vaccine. We informed him back then that we were surprised to learn that the polio virus used in the IPV component was derived from the aborted fetal cell line MRC-5 and that we had petitioned the vaccine injury court for her injury of life-long cryptogenic refractory seizures which have rendered her an invalid.

Years later, following our meeting with Congressman McGovern, Cecilia initially prevailed with her injury claim on 12/12/2017 in which Special Master Millman ruled

The undersigned finds that petitioners have prevailed on their allegations that CK’s vaccinations administered on October 2, 2012 caused her afebrile infantile spasms and a non Table chronic encephalopathy.

Under Althen Prong One, the undersigned finds that DTaP vaccine can trigger the onset of infantile spasms. Under Althen Prong Two, the undersigned finds that there was a logical sequence of cause and effect in DTaP causing CK’s onset of infantile spasms. Under Althen Prong Three, the undersigned finds that an onset within hours of DTaP vaccination is consistent with the effect of the vaccine’s triggering an abrupt onset.

After a prolonged settlement for her life care plan HHS appealed this decision in the summer of 2019 in which Cecilia and I traveled to “Coffee with your Congressmen” in order to ask him, “Why his colleagues were trying to pass the draconian bill H.R.2527 - Vaccinate All Children Act of 2019?”. Specifically, I asked him:

Why are many of your colleagues proposing requiring students at public elementary and secondary schools to be vaccinated by those listed on the schedule approved by The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), in which ACIP members have huge financial conflicts of interest and not one of these vaccines has been subject to a double blind placebo trial as is required of any other pharmaceutical not deemed a 'biologic'?

For example, one of its members, Paul Offit, voted the rotavirus vaccine for the schedule while he was developing his own rotavirus vaccine. He then proceeded to sell his vaccine to Merck for over $100 million and pocketed somewhere on the order of over $30 million [1]. Meanwhile, the 'safe' rotavirus vaccine he approved was removed due to the fact that kids were getting intussusception post vaccination.

When a child is injured the parents have only one recourse for help, to sue HHS in an adversarial vaccine injury court in which HHS is defended by the justice department. Typically, parents have the additional burden to provide scientific evidence to support their claim. This evidence is supposed to be provided by HHS who has the conflict of interest of reporting these vaccines are safe.

[1] Unfortunatley this broken link has now been censored by the federal government https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/06/25/vaccine-doctor-given-at-least-30-million-dollars-to-push-vaccines.aspx - censored

Thankfully, this act never became a law. However on February 27, 2020, HHS initially prevailed in their appeal as Judge Hertling vacated the now retired Special Master Millman’s decision noting that

Without any explanation for the special master’s acceptance of this conclusion, the Court finds the special master’s inference that the DPT study applies to the DTaP formulation at lower rates to be arbitrary and capricious.

and remanded her petition to a new Special Master Horner who Dismissed her petition on 06/02/2020 which withstood our initial appeal to Judge Hertling on 08/11/2020. However, on 06/15/2021 both of these subsequent decisions were unanimously reversed and the original decision by Special Master Millman was reinstated by the federal circuit court of appeals three judge panel of O'Malley, Circuit Judge; Reyna, Circuit Judge and Stoll, Circuit Judge.

CONCLUSION

The first special master [Millman] applied the correct legal standard and her finding that DTaP and DTP vaccinations could cause similar rare adverse effects, albeit at different rates, was not arbitrary and capricious. The second special master [Horner] improperly reweighed the evidence on remand. And the first special master’s factual findings meet the standard propounded in Althen. Thus, we reverse both Court of Federal Claims decisions [Hertling], and reinstate the first special master’s finding for the Kottenstettes, including the monetary award set by that special master.

REVERSED

As of 06/25/2022, over a full year since this decision, Cecilia is still waiting for assistance from this program which was supposedly established by Congress to help the victims in order to insure the safety of the vaccine supply. Yet, as we can see this program has turned into a legal battle field in which nearly every claim is defended to the hilt by DOJ lawyers in which HHS appears to want to deny all culpability of fault for their “safe and effective” vaccination program. Which leads us to our three questions for Congressmen McGovern on 06/18/2022.

Q.1 Will Jim help the petitioners to CICP?

HHS reports that their Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP)

is the payer of last resort and can only reimburse or pay for medical expenses or lost employment income that are not covered by other third-party payers. As of June 1, 2022, the CICP has not compensated any COVID-19 countermeasures claims.

One COVID-19 countermeasure claim, a COVID-19 vaccine claim due to an anaphylactic reaction, has been determined eligible for compensation and is pending a review of eligible expenses.

Of the 8,439 COVID-19 countermeasure claims, 5,449 allege injuries/deaths from COVID-19 vaccines and 2,990 allege injuries/deaths from other COVID-19 countermeasures.

How can Congressman McGovern help get assistance to the 5,449 injured and/or killed by the COVID-19 vaccines? I would estimate that around ten petitions (5,449/535) are from his district. Have any victims reached out to his office for help with filing a claim? In fact, there is no mechanism to provide for an expert witness or cover legal expenses in filing a claim to the CICP as is done with the vaccine injury court nor is their judicial oversight. The CICP truly is “the payer of last resort”. Can Congressman McGovern send an email out to the constituents of his district informing injured members that they can file a claim to the CICP if it is submitted within one year of the administration of the vaccine? Surely, an informed public of this crucial program could help with preventing agency capture of HHS’s biologics division of the FDA and the CDC as it would help victims while also helping to inform these agencies of the harms that are occurring so as to take appropriate measures to improve safety of these countermeasures.

Will Jim work with legislatures to investigate the EUA issued to COVID-19 vaccines for infants and toddlers?

In the state of MA not a single child aged 5-11 has died from COVID-19, in fact it is generally accepted that COVID-19 is less dangerous than the flu for infants, toddlers and children. Even more troubling is that the FDA committee responsible for issuing an EUA for these vaccines for children 6 months through 4 years of age failed to take note of the VAERS report and death record of a 7 year old girl who may have died from these vaccines in the state of MA. Finally, the data submitted to these committees showed these vaccines are neither safe nor effective for this age group. As is summed up in this short video in which Dr. Clare Craig Exposes How Pfizer Twisted Their Clinical Trial Data for Young Children. Can Jim McGovern reach out to these Senators and Congressmen to help get answers from the FDA about this COVID-19 EUA issued for children 6 months through 4 years of age? I believe he answered that he would work with these legislatures on this issue. However, he noted that parents can still choose not to give these vaccines to infants. Which leads us to our final question.

Is Jim aware that parents in MA may soon loose their right to a religous exemption to even a single vaccine in order to send there children to public and private schools?

We informed Jim, that parents may soon be forced into either having every CDC recommended “safe and effective” vaccine administered to their child in order to receive an education in MA and/or loose their child’s IEP services. Democrat Senator Rebbeca Rausch and Representative Andy Vargas have proposed a law which has been passed by the Joint Committee on Public Health known as “An Act relative to vaccines and preventing future disease outbreaks”. This law will only benefit Big Pharma as it will effectively create a permanent group of customers, school age children, who will have to receive whatever Pharma gets the FDA to approve as a liability free “safe and effective vaccine” or else be denied an education and/or IEP services. Deletions to the law are indicated by a strikethrough and insertions are indicated by italics as follows:

Section 15: Vaccination and immunization

No child shall, except as hereinafter provided, be admitted to school except upon presentation of a physician's certificate that the child has been successfully immunized against diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, measles and poliomyelitis and such other communicable diseases as may be specified from time to time by the department of public health.

A child shall be admitted to school upon certification by a physician that he has personally examined such child and that in his opinion the physical condition of the child is such that his health would be endangered by such vaccination or by any of such immunizations. Such certification shall be submitted at the beginning of each school year to the physician in charge of the school health program. If the physician in charge of the school health program does not agree with the opinion of the child's physician, the matter shall be referred to the department of public health, whose decision will be final.

In the absence of an emergency or epidemic of disease declared by the department of public health, no child whose parent or guardian states in writing that vaccination or immunization conflicts with his sincere religious beliefs shall be required to present said physician's certificate in order to be admitted to school.

All schools, whether public, private, or charter, that provide education to children in any combination of grade levels from kindergarten to grade 12, inclusive, shall annually report to the department total numbers of children who are successfully immunized in accordance with section 15 of chapter 76 and who are exempted from immunization requirements. The department shall designate the methodology for reporting.

The department shall annually publish and make publicly available aggregate immunizations and exemptions data for each school and school district, provided, that publishing and making publicly available such data shall not be required if it would result in disclosure of personal information as defined in section 1 of chapter 93H or otherwise violate applicable privacy laws. The department may also publish data by municipality, county, or other geographic designation, or otherwise in its discretion.

Health Choice 4 Action MA - Oppose Overreach @OpposeOverreach

The sneaky line in Bill H.4813, "strike paragraph 3". Paragraph three specifically protects our right to an exemption that cannot be declined. H.4813 would REMOVE the exemption, meaning your child MUST receive ANY and ALL vaccines mandated to go to school. #OPPOSEH4813

Conclusion

The biologics division of the FDA and the CDC appear to be firmly under the control of Pharma companies such as Pfizer, Moderna, Merck and Sanofi Pasteur. Their business models are now or will be built on mRNA vaccines as almost 50% of Pfizers revenue came from their COVID-19 vaccine netting over $35 billion in sales for 2021. Much of this revenue and profit came out of US tax dollars, yet these manufacturers have zero liability from any death and injuries caused by these vaccines. To make matters worse, HHS is responsible for helping these victims through the little known CICP program which is not even subject to judicial review. Yet, the insanity continues in which VRBPAC and ACIP committees unanimously voted for an EUA for 6-month olds in which the data provided said that these vaccines were neither safe nor effective. Yet BigPharma continues to grow in power as they have effectively captured much of the FDA while spending hundreds of millions of dollars annually to lobby nearly every Senator and Congressmen. They now have set their sites on the MA children with H. 4813.

Yes Congressmen McGovern H. 4813 is a state matter, yet the Democrat party seems to be fully under the control of BigPharma and “We are the Prey” to these Global Predators. Something needs to be done to halt and investigate a system that is out of control. All checks and balances to insure a safe and effective vaccine have been removed and a positive feedback loop has been created. When a positive feedback loop occurs in a system such as one caused by a faulty angle of attack sensor for an aircraft (i.e. fraudulent vaccine safety data, committees who interpret signals of harm in data as ‘safe’, agencies that don’t monitor the system for safety signals, etc.), catastrophic accidents happen which can’t even be averted by the pilots.