7 Comments

Nick, you and I talked about this in great detail on my show, The Right on Point podcast. I have a question for you. We both agree that the 4 whistleblowers were named in the lawsuit. In my opinion that was a very bad move. Now they are outed. And could be subject to disciplinary action by their commanding officers. Why were they not protected by the Federal whistleblower protection act and maybe entered as plaintiffs as John Doe 1, 2, 3 and Jane Doe 1?

Expand full comment

That is still noteworthy: 5-16% increase is what would be expected in the first year post LNP mRNA administration. Maybe it was a false flag op to 1st report times increases and then walk back to 5-16%.

If it was 5-16% right off the bat, it would still be huge news. In large numbers of affected subjects, these numbers are like once in a 100 years events. Well, we'll have to keep watching these numbers from month to month then. As Edward Dowd was saying, these things are alarming: https://youtu.be/dAIiVI7cNOE

Expand full comment